Controversial Stem Cell Procedure Robs Three Women Of Sight


March 24, 2017

Three older women were blinded shortly after undergoing a controversial stem cell replacement therapy designed to alleviate the symptoms of macular degeneration, according to the Miami Herald,. The three women, aged 72, 77, and 78 respectively, suffered varying degrees of blindness. Even after one year, the womens' vision had not returned. One was totally blind, and the others were left with 20/200 vision. The medical malpractice attorneys at Montlick & Associates, Attorneys at Law want their clients in the Southeastern portion of the U.S. to be leery of controversial, unproven, and risky medical procedures.

The eye disease from which the women suffered is common in older adults. They underwent a stem cell replacement procedure by which the stem cells from fat cells in the body were injected into their eyes. The procedure is designed to stop the progression of macular degeneration and the theory behind stem cell injections, which has not been subjected to rigorous testing and research, purports to re-grow the cells in the area in which the stem cells were introduced.

The women's injuries manifested quickly. Within a day and a half after receiving the injection, two of the three women were blinded and in the emergency room. They also experienced increased blood pressure in the eyes, excessive bleeding, retinal detachment, and lens dislocation. The clinic performed almost no follow-up or aftercare despite each patient paying $5,000.00 to have the treatment.

Many questions were raised from this procedure. One of the initial questions, which has not been answered, is why the doctors at the clinic injected both eyes of the women on the same day. According to the Miami Herald, a local ophthalmologist questioned the wisdom of injecting both eyes on the same day when more routine procedures, such as cataract surgery, are performed one eye at a time. The ophthalmologist was incredulous that someone would administer this treatment to both eyes considering the procedure is experimental.

Stem cell replacement holds the potential for great things, but the scientific research has yet to satisfy regulators or the medical community. Many purveyors of stem cell replacement applaud its potential to cure diseases and conditions previously believed to be incurable. Some processes are not monitored by the government because the stem cells are removed from the patient's body and are injected elsewhere in the body without much alteration. Medical professionals urge patients searching for answers to be careful when agreeing to participate in such experimental trials.

Put Our Law Firm's Over 33 Years Of Legal Experience To Work For Your Case!

If you have been injured by someone else's negligence, contact Montlick & Associates, Attorneys at Law for your free consultation today. Montlick & Associates has been representing those who suffer serious injuries throughout all of Georgia and in the Southeast for over thirty-three years, including but not limited to Albany, Athens, Atlanta, Augusta, Columbus, Gainesville, Macon, Marietta, Rome, Roswell, Savannah, Smyrna, Valdosta, Warner Robins and all smaller cities and rural areas in the state.

No matter where you are located our attorneys are just a phone call away, and we will even come to you. Call us 24 hours day/7 days a week for your Free Consultation at 1-800-LAW-NEED (1-800-529-6333). You can also visit us online at www.montlick.com and use our Free Case Evaluation Form or 24-hour live chat.

Source: http://www.miamiherald.com/news/health-care/article139003663.html

Montlick & Associates, Attorneys at Law

17 Executive Park Dr NE
Atlanta, GA 30329
Telephone: 1 (404) 529-6333
Toll Free: 1 (800) LAW-NEED


Please Note:
Many of our blog articles discuss the law. All information provided about the law is very general in nature and should not be relied upon as legal advice. Every situation is different, and should be analyzed by a lawyer who can provide individualized advice based on the facts involved in your unique situation, and a consideration of all of the nuances of the statutes and case law that apply at the time.