Can A Jury Award Punitive Damages For A Georgia Car Accident Claim?


June 30, 2017

Punitive damages, sometimes called exemplary damages, may be awarded Georgia to car accident victims in rare instances. A jury may award punitive damages to a car accident victim as punishment of the motorist who caused the crash for reckless behavior, such as driving while intoxicated or driving in a manner consistent with previous driving infractions such as speeding or reckless driving. The potential for punitive damages is an issue which must be thoroughly discussed between car accident victims and their car accident attorneys. Car accident victims need to understand that punitive damages are not available in every case. However, a knowledgeable and experienced Georgia car accident attorney will know how to perform an exhaustive investigation to discover whether there is any justification for seeking punitive damages.

Punitive damages, sometimes called exemplary damages, may be awarded Georgia to car accident victims in rare instances. A jury may award punitive damages to a car accident victim as punishment of the motorist who caused the crash for reckless behavior, such as driving while intoxicated or driving in a manner consistent with previous driving infractions such as speeding or reckless driving. The potential for punitive damages is an issue which must be thoroughly discussed between car accident victims and their car accident attorneys. Car accident victims need to understand that punitive damages are not available in every case. However, a knowledgeable and experienced Georgia car accident attorney will know how to perform an exhaustive investigation to discover whether there is any justification for seeking punitive damages.

The question of whether punitive damages should be awarded to a car wreck victim was recently examined by the Georgia Court of Appeals.  In the case of Dagne v. Schroeder, the plaintiff, Schroeder, had picked her daughter up from school in the family van and was headed home. The defendant was driving on the same road but headed in the opposite direction. Witnesses in the area observed the defendant to be operating erratically. The witnesses were driving in the same direction as the defendant and tried to pass her after she came to a complete stop in the middle of the road, without any apparent reason to do so. However, her could not do so because the defendant accelerated to prevent the witnesses from passing.

The defendant’s erratic operation continued. After the witness had tried to pass the defendant for the second time, the she sped up and went through a stop sign without stopping. She then brought her car to a stop in the middle of an intersection, remained there for a couple of seconds then took off.  Witnesses said that the driver swerved into her lane repeatedly. She then came to a stop and angled her car toward on-coming traffic after slowing and accelerating at an intersection. The plaintiff testified she believed the defendant was going to allow her to pass. She did not. and instead turned in front of the plaintiff, who swerved but could not avoid a crash. Upon impact, the plaintiff’s van went airborne and tumbled after striking the defendant.

Good Samaritans came to the aid of the plaintiff and her daughter, and found the her hanging by her seatbelt. The witnesses also noticed that the plaintiff’s leg was contorted and she screamed in pain. Her daughter was also injured. The defendant was dazed but appeared uninjured. She did not try to help the plaintiff or her daughter after the crash. The witness who called 911 believed that the accident was caused by a drunk driver.

The plaintiff sued to recover damages for her injuries as well as her daughter’s injuries. The plaintiff also claimed punitive damages based upon the theory that the defendant was impaired at the time of the crash as well as the defendant’s prior driving history. The jury, in this case, returned a punitive damages award of $150,000 for the plaintiffs.

In Georgia, a trial in which punitive damages is sought requires the case to be tried in two parts. The first part involves the question of the liability of the defendant. The second part pertains to the punitive damages portion. During the first part of the trial, the judge allowed the witnesses to testify that they suspected the defendant was driving while impaired based upon her erratic driving. The police officer who responded to the crash scene performed tests which showed that the defendant was not impaired. However, the trial judge allowed the case to go to the jury on the issue of punitive damages because there was sufficient evidence at trial to conclude that the defendant operated her vehicle in such a way as to demonstrate a conscious indifference to human life and the safety of others. 

Put Our Law Firm's Over 33 Years Of Legal Experience To Work For Your Case!

If you have been involved in any accident caused by someone else's negligence, call the auto accident lawyers at Montlick & Associates, Attorneys at Law for your free consultation today. Montlick & Associates, Attorneys at Law has been representing those who suffer serious injuries throughout all of Georgia and in the Southeast for over thirty-three years, including but not limited to Albany, Athens, Atlanta, Augusta, Columbus, Gainesville, Macon, Marietta, Rome, Roswell, Savannah, Smyrna, Valdosta, Warner Robins and all smaller cities and rural areas in the state.

No matter where you are located our attorneys are just a phone call away, and we will even come to you. Call us 24 hours day/7 days a week for your Free Consultation at 1-800-LAW-NEED (1-800-529-6333). You can also visit us online at www.montlick.com and use our Free Case Evaluation Form or 24-hour live chat.

Montlick & Associates, Attorneys at Law
17 Executive Park Dr NE
Atlanta, GA 30329
Telephone: 1 (800) LAW-NEED
Telephone: 1 (404) 529-6333
Open: 24 hours, 7 Days a Week

Category: Auto Accidents

Please Note:
Many of our blog articles discuss the law. All information provided about the law is very general in nature and should not be relied upon as legal advice. Every situation is different, and should be analyzed by a lawyer who can provide individualized advice based on the facts involved in your unique situation, and a consideration of all of the nuances of the statutes and case law that apply at the time.